Arrangement, keyword buy, and you may combination in some types of Arabic

  • ^ The 5 sub-kind of fillers was indeed: hybrid agreement nouns which have good possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbors,” where komsija normally result in M otherwise F contract), such as (15b); hybrid arrangement nouns which have a possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my laugher,” where cerekalo can end in Meters or Letter contract), as in (15c); NSg animate nouns that have an enthusiastic ordinal amount [prvo prase “(the) very first pig,” where prase enjoys a hybrid plural function, triggering FSg otherwise NPl agreement], such as (15d); typical contract nouns which have a great MSg nominal complement [uspeh dekana “(the) victory (of the) dean,” where genitive match is homonymous on the paucal, additionally the paucal lets paucal and MPl agreement], as with (15e); typical contract MSg nouns that have an effective PP fit (prijatelj iz skole “the fresh new pal out of school,” in which appeal effects will be requested), such as (15f).
  • ^ The fresh salience of instances is controlled regarding the following the way. Earliest, you to publisher formulated the fresh new instances centered on her instinct, and also the almost every other evaluated them; where disagreement came up, instances have been replaced and processes is repeated on the freshly delivered advice.
  • ^ The necessity of the essential difference between contract activities in the updates are orthogonal with the hypotheses regarding notice of the report, because they only build predictions in regards to the cousin volume within requirements, otherwise between the requirements in addition to ft-range ratios. I statement these types of examination for the sake of completeness of your own report, while the told because of the editors of your frequency.
  • ^ I’ve tailored and you will administered another experiment similar to this, and now we are checking out the information and knowledge.


Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effectation of animacy and agentivity to your operating regarding agreement during the Serbo-Croatian,” within the Knowledge inside Languages and you will Attention, Picked files of 3rd Novi Sad Working area into Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and Systematic Linguistic Research, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you will S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Unfortunate: Professors from Beliefs), 41–77.

Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, We. (2016b). With the within the dependency out of intercourse when it comes to matter inside agreement having coordinated victims: a fresh data. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 41–69.

Ba). Morphology, contract and dealing memories recovery in the phrase production: proof out-of gender and you will case when you look at the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.

Barber, H., and you can Carreiras, Meters. (2005). Grammatical gender and you can amount contract within the Foreign-language: An ERP assessment. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.

Bhatt, R., and Walkow, Yards. (2013). Finding contract when you look at the sentence structure: a quarrel regarding arrangement from inside the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 31, 951–1013.

Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim we postponiranim predikatom you srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.

Lme4: Linear Combined-Consequences Activities Having fun with S4 Groups

Carminati, M. (2005). Running reactions of your feature hierarchy (person > count > gender) and implications having linguistic theory. Lingua 115, 259–285.

Chomsky, Letter. (2001). “Derivation by Phase,” inside the Ken Hale. A lives within the Vocabulary, ed. Yards. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Drive), 1–52.

Citko, B. (2004). “Contract asymmetries inside the enhance formations,” in the Official Approaches to Slavic linguistics: The newest Ottawa Fulfilling 2003, eds An effective. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you will D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications), 91–108.

De- Vincenzi, Meters. (1999). Differences when considering the new morphology of sex and you can matter: facts regarding establishing coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. twenty-eight, 537–553.

De Vincenzi, Meters., and you can Di Domenico, E. (1999). A big difference one of ?-features: the character off gender and you may count regarding the recovery out of pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 41–74.

Doron, Elizabeth. (2000). “VSO and kept-conjunct arrangement : biblical Hebrew compared to. modern Hebrew,” regarding the Syntax of the Verb 1st my company Languages, eds A beneficial. Carnie and you will E. Guilfoyle (Ny, NY: Oxford University Press), 75–96.